Reflection on Jack Deere's "Voice of God"


Deere's overarching thesis in his book "Voice of God" is that the contemporary American churches and churchgoers have lost their ability to speak to and hear from God effectively. Christians are blind to various supernatural ways that God still used to speak to His people even in today's 21st century churches. Deere attributes the main cause of this blindness to "Bible deity".[1] He claims that he has the support from the Bible and from the church history which gave him numerous examples. He wants to prove that the language of the Holy Spirit has been spoken and is still being spoken today through the Bible, experience, natural means, and even through the supernatural means.   
With interesting stories and illustrations, Deere wants to show the readers that God is still using visions, dreams, and other supernatural ways to communicate with us today. He argued that the first century church experience can be and should be felt today. It is our unbelief that makes us deaf to God’s voice. To support his claim, Deere employs theological methods by going back to the Bible to find evidence, citing Christian traditions with similar teachings, and using personal experiences to prove his point - God is still speaking to us peculiarly in dreams and impressions.

Deere's Four Charges on Contemporary Churches

Deere pointed out a common problem existed in many contemporary churches - powerlessness. Without too much hesitation, Deere accused liberal churchgoers and orthodox evangelicals with four charges - rationalism unbelief, hypocrite unbelief, theological unbelief, and conspiracy theory. 

Deere charged liberal Christians with rationalism unbelief. He claimed that many liberal Christians are blind to the supernatural revelation. He said that "many of us have been conditioned to read the Bible in terms of our experience rather than in terms of the experience of the people in the Bible. If we don't hear God's voice today in special ways, we assumed he is not speaking in special ways anymore."[2] On the other side of the spectrum, Deere also accused conservative evangelicals of hypocrite unbelief. He claimed that these conservatives don't want anything to do with the rationalistic unbelief of liberals, but they are doing the same because "They are certain every miracle in the Bible took place just as it's recorded, yet when it comes to applying the Bible to today's experience, many conservatives are filled with the same kind of unbelief as the liberals." As a result of this "de-supernaturalization", Christians today experienced very little of God's supernatural power and, even worse, Christians "stop reading the Bible altogether."[3]
 
Deere attributed his third charge to the theological unbelief - the unbelief caused by the very theological method we used today to read the Bible. He argued that we were taught not to expect these supernatural things, which left us with barely "a moralistic version of Christianity that believes discipline is the key to the spiritual life."[4] The last charge Deere filed was the conspiracy theory, which Deere blamed on the Reformers. I have no reason to believe what he claimed is true. Many theologians might have dismissed the idea of supernatural power simply because of their convictions, but I have no reason to believe that there were "black hands" controlling their decisions. Deere used these charges to make his claim - if we want to be "normal" Christians, we all need to learn the language of the Holy Spirit.

My Response to Deere's Charges

Upon hearing Deere's four charges, I have two questions in mind. First, do we all need to see visions to be "normal" Christian? Second question, do we need to "learn" the language of the Holy Spirit in order to speak to God?

Is It "Normal" to See Visions?

Do we need to see visions or hear God's voices to be "normal"? For many Christians who are neither the rationalism liberals nor the extreme orthodox churchgoers, we walk our faith daily by spending time in Bible study and devotions, praying to God for thanksgiving and for deliverance without seeing or experiencing literal visions, dreams, voices, or special revelations. If we don't see visions or hear voices, does that make us "abnormal"? or does it make us an unbeliever? Didn't Jesus say, "because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”[5] Didn't Paul also teach us "for we walk by faith, not by sight"?[6]

I don't think it's "normal" to see vision if we define "normal" as something of normality - things are to be expected. Growing up in a country full of pagan idols and demonic forces, Christians in Taiwan had learned to keen on God and His Holy Spirit to overcome demon's control. Although I was not at the epic center to witness the dramas, but stories were told and circulated in many local churches about the "de-idolization" ceremonies that pastors and elders were frequently conducting for new believers. Numerous instances of demon overpowering new believers were reported, indicating the demons' struggles of their leaving from their old hosts, very much like what the Bible recorded (e.g. two demon-possessed men at Gadarenes)[7]. Back in my home church in Taiwan, we were told to fast and pray in order to cast out demons, just as what Jesus taught His disciples to do.[8]
 
We don't rely on visions to cast out demons. For many Christians in Taiwan, especially those who lived in rural areas, spiritual warfare was very frequent and real. God's supernatural power was felt almost every day. Most of spiritual warfare were fought through fasting and prayers, seldom did I hear stories about God's visions, voices, or dreams in fighting with demons. Interestingly, I did hear many stories about visions, voices and dreams from the dead, demons, or false gods through mediators or sorcerers.  

I don't want to dismiss any possibility of God using miraculous clear voice or literal visions to help us fight in a spiritual warfare, but most of the de-idolization processes I have heard were so intense and were happening so fast, visions and voices seemed to be ineffective during these hand combat situations. More importantly, pastors and elders who were conducting the front-line de-idolization services had little time to discern whether the visions and voices were coming from God or not, because they were very aware that demons could have adopted the same techniques to give wrong directions. The only trust-worthy method to expel a demon from a person at that very moment was a desperate prayer in the name of Jesus, just as what Jesus told us to do.[9]

 Almost all sorcerers, ghost mediators, and demon brokers in Taiwan were involved in using visions, voices, and dreams to communicate with pagan gods or the dead. These supernatural phenomenon were considered demonic. In a pagan environment, the last thing you need, as a pastor, is to confuse your believers with the teachings of God's visions, voices, and dreams. In a quick search in the four Gospels, I haven't found a single instance that dreams and impressions were used to cast out the demonic spirits.

Does that mean God cannot and won't use visions, voices and dreams to communicate with us? certainly not, God is omnipotent and He certainly can use any means to deliver His messages to us! My concern is not whether He can or cannot, my concern is how we discern God's visions, voices, and dreams from those of demonic forces.

Is It Required to Learn the Language of the Holy Spirit?

Do we need to learn the language of the Holy Spirit? and if I don't speak the language of the Holy Spirit, am I any less spiritual than those who do?
So, what is the language of the Holy Spirit? According to Deere, all that described in 1 Corinthians 14:26 is the language of the Holy Spirit, which he listed as "revelation, word of knowledge, word of wisdom, tongue, interpretation, healing, teaching, or anything else that might edify some of those present."[10]
 
Deere analogized the Bible as the "food menu" and he argued that the "Holy Spirit and the explanation of his language" is the actual food. [11] He said people "who devote themselves diligently to Bible study and are still spiritually malnourished" because they are just going to the "menu club" to study the "menu" without ordering the food. I don't know which "menu club" church he used to go, but it's certainly not my church. He continued to say that "if we make Bible study our goal, we will end up just like the Pharisees who searched the Scriptures diligently but never came to Christ (John 5:39-40)."[12] If I remember correctly, weren't there many thousands of believers who came to Christ way before the day of Pentecost? didn't they all eagerly study the Bible? Apparently, these early believers came to Christ and received the eternal life even before they received the spiritual gifts.   

I agreed that the Holy Spirit may use any means to communicate with us, including revelation, word of knowledge/wisdom, tongue, interpretation, healing, and teaching. The Holy Spirit gave us spiritual gifts to help us edify each other in order to build the church up. Apostle Paul used entire chapter 12, 13, and 14 in 1 Corinthians to explain the spiritual gifts and how each body part connected to the body.[13] I have no double that some of us may be given one or two spiritual gifts from the Holy Spirit, but I have hard time understand how and why we can "learn" these spiritual gifts. Can we all learn how to speak in tongue? how about healing? 

I don't think we can "learn" the language of the Holy Spirit in the same sense of learning a technique or a skill. If we can and if we are required to learn it, then I believe we should be able to find many supporting evidence in the Bible on how to learn it.

"Unbelief" in the Language of the Holy Spirit 

Earlier we said that Deere brought four charges to "regular" Christians, but eventually he was accusing all of us only one charge - unbelief, not believing in the power of God's voice, visions, and dreams as personal guidelines, directions, or even divine revelations. This accusation of unbelief reminded me of the story of the rich man and Lazarus.[14] At the end of Lazarus' story, Abraham told the tormenting rich man, regarding his request to send Lazarus to warm his five brothers, that ‘if they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.” Clearly, Jesus implied that the Scripture alone was what they needed for salvation. 

Using Lazarus' story, I would stand firmly and claim that Scripture is sufficient for salvation and for godly living through the Bible's "teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,  so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work."[15] (The Greek word for "thoroughly" is ἀρτιος, which means "to being well fitted for some function, complete, capable, proficient=able to meet all demands"[16] All requirements for a believer to be equipped completely for every good work is in the Bible, so what else do we need? Of course, we will need the Holy Spirit to help us understand, comprehend, and apply the Scripture, and that's why we all need to submit to the Holy Spirit and let Him take control of us. However, all the information needed for salvation and a godly living is already provided in the Bible.

I agreed with Deere that pride is the number one enemy to receive God's divine guidance, either through the Scripture or through a special divine revelation in the forms of visions, voices, or dreams. I don't believe that Deere is trying to invalidate the Scripture from its sufficiency, but the way he presented in his book sounds like we need more than just the Bible.

Deere's Theological Methods on Revelation

Deere follows the traditional theological methods by going back to the Bible and church history to find support for his thesis and claims, along with his pastoral experiences and personal observations. With plenty of internal and external evidences recorded in the Bible, Deere confidently demonstrates that Jesus was in a constant communication with the Holy Spirit and with God the Father through His dedicated prayer life, because Jesus "listened to God, and then as one empowered by the Holy Spirit, he spoke and acted."[17] Indeed, Jesus is a perfect model for us to "share the same Holy Spirit who empowered Jesus and his followers in the first century."[18] If Deere stopped here at Chapter 4, I would have agreed with him totally that, as a contemporary American Christian, we should also live out a spirit-filled life in which we are to receive this "supernatural power", the same power that Jesus and his disciples received to witness and to heal, the same power that Jesus' followers received to communicate with the Holy Spirit freely. Deere argued that this "supernatural power" should include the ability to see the visions, dream the dreams, and to prophesy.[19] Should we expect the same "supernatural power" today in our 21st century churches?

Are We in a Different Dispensation? 

From the perspective of a dispensationalist, we want to ask whether God's administrative method has changed since first century. Are we in a different dispensation? Deere apparently rooted his arguments in the continuity of the same administration in the 21st century as that in the first century. Is he right? We want to carefully examine any evidence of an administrative change since the days of Jesus event and after the descending of the Holy Spirit.   

As Deere did, we want to go back to the Bible, specifically going back to the four Gospels and the Acts and see if we can find changes from what early Christians have experienced. My thesis is that we want to root our faith in both God's Word and the Spirit as Jesus and the early Christians did. 

We want to worship God in God's Word. As Jesus taught us, "God is a spirit, you will worship Him in Spirit and in truth."[20] God is truth simply because He is the very reason that we come to being and the final destination that we come to rest in eternity. In other words, God is truth that everything measures up.[21] Since God revealed Himself in the Scripture, so we find truth by finding God in God's Word.[22] And thus, we want to worship God with the "knowledge of Him".[23] At the same time, we also want to worship God in Spirit. Without God's Spirit or the Holy Spirit, we won't be able to "remember, understand, interpret, and apply" the truth we found in the Scripture.[24] The Bible has everything we need for salvation and for a godly living,[25] but we also need to put the Holy Spirit in the driver's seat so that we can understand God's Word correctly. 

The balance between the study of God's Word and the empowerment of the Holy Spirit has been demonstrated throughout the Bible. During the days that disciples and believers were waiting in the Upper Room, they were praying. When Peter stood up among the believers and said, “Brothers and sisters, the Scripture had to be fulfilled in which the Holy Spirit spoke long ago through David concerning Judas, who served as guide for those who arrested Jesus.”[26] Peter was quoting the Old Testament.[27] Apparently, they had been studying the Scripture diligently and were obeying wholeheartedly. Similarly, in Acts 17:11, Luke recorded that Jews in Berea "examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true." Jesus Himself testified that " You study the Scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. These are the very Scriptures that testify about me."[28] Without the foundation of the Scripture, all the spiritual signs and wonders we received may only give dangerous impressions that can be easily imitated by Satan.[29]
 
Deere points out that Acts recorded a Holy Spirit event which "inaugurated an age of revelation."[30] Most dispensationalists will not deny that the Holy Spirit event on the day of Pentecost recorded in Acts 1:8 marked a new administration of the grace and the Holy Spirit. What is not clear is whether this administration of grace and the Holy Spirit has changed upon the completion of the Canon. 

I am not convinced there is such an administrative change[31]. If someone believes that a new administration has been inaugurated upon the completion of the Canon, then he or she will bear the burden of proof. Do we see a change of the New Covenant that Jesus inaugurated (by grace through faith in Jesus Christ)? no, I don't think so. Do we see a new instruction regarding to dietary or Sabbath changes? no, I am not aware of that either. Do we see a new instruction to communicate with God in different ways? I don't believe so, except that we now have iPhones and Social Media :-) 

In short, I believe we are still in this same "age of revelation". God still wants us to study the Bible diligently and, by His divine power, we have everything we need for a godly life. I believe the Holy Spirit still gives us visions, dreams, and the ability to see God's revelations more clearly (aka. prophesying). Although these spiritual gifts may not be given commonly to all churches or to all Christians in Northern America, but that doesn't mean that the work of the Holy Spirit cannot be seen and testified everywhere else.

So Why Can't We See Visions? 

So if it is not an administrative change as a dispensationalist would refer to it, why can't we see visions and hear God's voice and experience God's power in a supernatural ways? did God administer us differently based on different people groups or different cultures? or did we have a wrong interpretation of what God meant by "everything we need"?[32]  

To answer this latter questions, we will need to go back to what Deere claimed to be "normal". I think Deere made a generalization move by claiming that what he observed and experienced is true and is "normal" so that everyone else should just follow suit. I found myself hard to accept that claim.[33] However, he did point a common problem faced by many Western believers and I think Deere may have shared the same cultural experience. 

God's power may sound very distance for many Western believers, especially believers coming from generations of Christian heritage. The "faith" part of the "faith seeking understanding" has been largely assumed in many Western believers, which means they may have never experienced the power of change - the change that challenges every aspect of a person's belief, culture, and worldview; the change that empowers believers to give up their wealth, their social statuses, even their lives. But we have seen these changes in the first century believers.

 As a result, the "seeking understanding" part of the equation had been emphasized for many Western Christians, especially after the Reformation which unfortunately had been largely tilted toward rationalism. So what caused this internal heart-level change? is it from the knowledge of God? or from God's divine power? 

I would argue that it is from both, as Peter told us in 2 Peter 1:3.[34] Although I agreed with what Deere said about God's always taking the initiative and opens a person's heart to believe,[35] but I also believe that it cannot be done without His divine power (2 Peter 1:3). It is this divine power that helps believers take a responsive step toward God's initiative. The greatest miracle is the ability to see the vision of God's saving grace, to hear the voice of God's calling to repent, and to accept the sign of God's love through the work of Jesus. For many first generation Christians in Taiwan, especially those who were converted from a folk religion, they had the first hand experience of intense spiritual warfare between God and the false gods. The supernatural power from the Holy Spirit is a daily phenomenon.   

Can Dreams and Impressions be Learned? 

Since we are still in the same administrative era, I would agree with Deere that the Holy Spirit is still communicating with believers in supernatural ways. And I would agree that we ought to practice and learn how to communicate with the Holy Spirit - to be controlled by the Holy Spirit. However, I would be very careful on defining what the Holy Spirit would choose to comminute with us. Deere singles out dreams and impressions as the language of the Holy Spirit in Chapter 11 of his God's Voice book, which makes me wonder if he claims that dreams and impressions are essential in a Christian's spiritual life. Does he claim that every Christian should learn how to speak the language of dreams and impressions.[36] Deere wants all of us to learn it when we are young or at least learn it like a child without feeling embarrassed or go to places where the language are spoken such as this "School of the Spirit" in North Carolina.[37]  

Can dreams and impressions be learned? What bothers me most is the fact that Deere didn't call dreams and impressions spiritual gifts as Paul did in 1 Corinthians 12. If Deere would have called them gifts of the Holy Spirit and have managed to defend them biblically, then I would have no trouble believing that dreams and impressions are indeed parts of spiritual gifts and that some of us may possess these gifts for the purpose of edifying each other. If they are spiritual gifts, then they will be "freely" given by the Holy Spirit. So if I don't have them, I won't feel bad. If dreams and impressions are indeed spiritual gifts, then whoever received them shouldn't need to learn them and whoever don't have them shouldn't be able to learn them. So, why did Deere ask all of us to learn them? is it simply because they are "normal"? so we ought to learn them. It's "normal" for a 6'7" basketball player to learn how to do dunk shots, but that doesn't mean everyone needs to learn how to do it.    

If dreams and impressions are not spiritual gifts, are they important spiritual "tools"? are they helping me become more "spiritual"? if so, please define "spiritual"? If I am fully immersed in God's Word, deeply touched by God's wisdom and grace, and fully controlled by the Holy Spirit, does that make me a "Bible deitiest"? Spiritual poverty and powerlessness[38] cannot be cured simply by learning how to speak dreams and impressions. The last thing you want for a believer is to use a spiritual gift as a means to boast his or her spirituality as Paul warned us[39]. You don't want to make a believer feel powerful with a vision that no one has or make someone feel superior with a voice that even his or her pastors cannot hear. I feel that Deere also observed the danger of the prophetic pitfalls and that's why he used several chapter to address them.     

Summary

I have no problem agreeing with Deere's arguments that God is still speaking to us today through supernatural means. What I have trouble with is that Deere made a blanket generalization of his own experience and demanded everyone to follow suit or facing his accusation of being "Bible deity" or being "religious proud". I think he successfully pointed out that spiritual poverty and powerlessness are two deadly problems facing by many Northern American churches today, but I am not convinced that we can solve the problem simply by learning the language of dreams and impressions. Deere's way of pointing out someone's dirty past by using a visual phrase or word is no different from what a sorcerer did in a folk religion. I think he owes us a reasonable explanation on how we can discern the source of that imagery. The challenge of seeing imageries always lies on the discernment. I still believe that we have everything we need for a godly living as Peter said, "His divine power has given us everything we need for a godly life through our knowledge of Him who called us by His own glory and goodness."


[1] Deere, Jack, Surprised by the Voice of God: How God Speaks Today Through Prophecies, Dreams, and Visions (Grand Rapid, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996), 251.
[2] Deere, Jack, Surprised by the Voice of God: How God Speaks Today Through Prophecies, Dreams, and Visions (Grand Rapid, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996), 26.
[3] Deere's quote from Dallas Willard.
[4] Deere, Jack, Surprised by the Voice of God: How God Speaks Today Through Prophecies, Dreams, and Visions (Grand Rapid, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996), 27.
[5] John 20:29
[6] 2 Corinthians 5:7
[7] Matthew 8:28
[8] Matthew 17:21
[9] Mark 16:17
[10] In 1 Corinthians 14:26, it lists as "a hymn, or a word of instruction, a revelation, a tongue or an interpretation. Everything must be done so that the church may be built up" (NIV).
[11] Deere, Jack, Surprised by the Voice of God: How God Speaks Today Through Prophecies, Dreams, and Visions (Grand Rapid, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996), 174.
[12] Ibid., 175.
[13] 1 Corinthians 12:4-6
[14] Luke 16:19-31
[15] 2 Timothy 3:16-17
[16] Arndt, W., Danker, F. W., Bauer, W., & Gingrich, F. W. (2000). A Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature (3rd ed., p. 136). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[17] Deere, Jack, Surprised by the Voice of God: How God Speaks Today Through Prophecies, Dreams, and Visions (Grand Rapid, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996), 46.
[18] Ibid., 47.
[19] Acts 2:14. Peter's quoting of Joel 2:28-32.
[20] John 4:24.
[21] Definition by Wolterstorff. See Wolterstorff, Nicholas. True Words. from But Is It All True ed. Padgett.Eerdmans.2006
[22] Num 23:19; Isa. 40:8; Isa 65:16; Titus 1:2; Heb 6:18.
[23] 2 Peter 1:3.
[24] John 14:26.
[25] 2 Timothy 3:15-17.
[26] Acts 1:15-16.
[27] Psalm 69:25 and Psalm 109:8.
[28] John 5:39.
[29] 2 Thessalonians 2:9; Matthew 24:24.
[30] Deere, Jack, Surprised by the Voice of God: How God Speaks Today Through Prophecies, Dreams, and Visions (Grand Rapid, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996), 53.
[31] or change in dispensation.
[32] 2 Peter 1:3. Everyone may have different level of "needs". One may put his trust in Him because of one touching hymn which melt his heart and lead him a total surrender. Others may require years of rational persuasion to change his worldview. Jesus' divine power gives us everything we need, but what I need may be different from what others need.
[33] Since professor Kreider has a God-given musical gift, should I be expected to "learn" that musical gift? 
[34] "His divine power has given us everything we need for a godly life through our knowledge of Him who called us by His own glory and goodness." 2 Peter 1:3.
[35] Deere, Jack, Surprised by the Voice of God: How God Speaks Today Through Prophecies, Dreams, and Visions (Grand Rapid, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996), 60.
[36] Deere, Jack, Surprised by the Voice of God: How God Speaks Today Through Prophecies, Dreams, and Visions (Grand Rapid, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996), 169.
[37] Ibid., 170.
[38] Ibid., 160.
[39] 1 Corinthians 12.

No comments:

Post a Comment